You’re talking there about making a judgment based on what I see in your face.Īlexander Todorov: Exactly, exactly. Hal Weitzman: So just to be clear, you’re not talking there just about facial recognition in recognizing the face. At the same time, it’s very accessible and will be more and more accessible. And this is where the use of this kind of technology is deeply problematic. The use that I’m particularly concerned, which is ethically problematic, is using facial images to profile people, to trying to infer stable personality characteristics like competence, extraversion, and these attributes that can help you get a job or not get a job. One has to do with facial recognition identification. How, currently, are businesses using facial imaging in their deci-sion-making or how are they thinking of using facial imaging?Īlexander Todorov: So there are varieties of different uses, and we don’t know much about all of the uses. Panel, welcome to “The Big Question.” Alex Todorov, let me start with you. And Ben Zhao is the Neubauer Professor of Computer Science at the University of Chicago. Wilma Bainbridge is an assistant profes-sor in the Department of Psychology at the University of Chicago. Alexander Todorov is the Leon Carroll Marshall Professor of Behavioral Science at Chicago Booth. I’m Hal Weitzman, and with me to discuss the issue is an expert panel. So is it ethical to use facial imaging in decision-making, and how should we regulate the use of facial recog-nition software? Welcome to “The Big Question,” the video series from Chicago Booth Review. At the same time, the use of fa-cial recognition technology is becoming more widespread, prompting concerns over privacy. Hal Weitzman: First impressions are shaped by deep biases that lead us to associate faces with traits such as competence and trustworthiness.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |